So I spent part of the holidays watching Chuck, burning through the first season in about a week. Back when I first heard about it, the premise didn't grab me at all: how many shows have we seen about young male nerds forced through circumstance to become secret agents? Chuck sounded no different from the rest. But fandom kept saying, this is really good, so I figured I had to check it out.
There are many reasons I like this show. I like how Chuck is a good person. I like that he has a great relationship with his sister and her boyfriend, who on another show could have been so easily his antagonists. I like how the real secret agents assigned to protect him have to pretend to hold down customer service jobs. I like the fun and the banter. But most of all I like that the writers understand why viewers are won over by a show: the people.
Chuck is a show where the emotional story is given primacy over the physical story. No one watching gives two hoots about whether the spies steal the plans for the nuclear submarine or if the terrorists manage to blow up the embassy. We care about whether Chuck misses the special family dinner with his sister or if his rival gets promoted over him at work. These personal stakes feel so much more real than the political stakes, and the genius of the show is that the writers recognise their importance and focus the show on them. The A plot and the B plot are reversed, in that the mission of the week is merely a MacGuffin to trigger the development of the themes, relationships, and characters - and it all works.
A lot of shows could learn from this.
There are many reasons I like this show. I like how Chuck is a good person. I like that he has a great relationship with his sister and her boyfriend, who on another show could have been so easily his antagonists. I like how the real secret agents assigned to protect him have to pretend to hold down customer service jobs. I like the fun and the banter. But most of all I like that the writers understand why viewers are won over by a show: the people.
Chuck is a show where the emotional story is given primacy over the physical story. No one watching gives two hoots about whether the spies steal the plans for the nuclear submarine or if the terrorists manage to blow up the embassy. We care about whether Chuck misses the special family dinner with his sister or if his rival gets promoted over him at work. These personal stakes feel so much more real than the political stakes, and the genius of the show is that the writers recognise their importance and focus the show on them. The A plot and the B plot are reversed, in that the mission of the week is merely a MacGuffin to trigger the development of the themes, relationships, and characters - and it all works.
A lot of shows could learn from this.