Date: 2003-03-03 11:28 pm (UTC)
Although the shipper in me keeps insisting that it's all due to Archie's devastating loss...

I too have persistent strong feelings on that issue.

It would make sense if the change occurred before (the majority of) "Loyalty" - there was Archie, and the end of the war - which meant him losing his first command, *and* being stuck on land away from all his (remaining) friends/associates, with nothing to do and (as he thought) no-one caring if he lived or died. Suddenly he had essentially *no* duty. *Then* he was put back in command... he'd take it damn seriously, and have no time for anything else. I mean, even more so than before.

apparently told entirely from Bush's point of view

Ooh, that'd be interesting in and of itself, seeing Horatio from anyone else's POV. I wonder what it means in terms of those events (which I'm assuming are similar in the film)? Keep me informed? I have a nagging fear that it'll mean that Horatio's actions will remain ambiguous. Well, ambiguous is probably a good thing - the twisty brain-teaser of the films, OTOH, I'm not sure I'm so fond of.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 09:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios